In the article Brook
Sadler presents ten reasons to punish internet plagiarism. The reasons he
presents are fairly run of the mill: encourages work ethic, teaches pride in
the student etc. I think the strongest point he makes is that the student does
not struggle with the work himself. I have seen this in myself and have only
come to be able to write by struggling through the exercises. Russell Hunt presents four reasons to embrace
internet plagiarism. The main points being that the current academic models are
outdated and useless in a work environment, and that since internet plagiarism is
here to stay we should teach students how to properly use it to increase the
quality of their education. He seems to believe that this is an opportunity to
fix a problem that’s been broken for some time and his case is compelling, as
the process of teaching students to use secondary sources well has certainly
been lost on me until very recently. But I couldn’t help but feel this was a
bit of a red herring, as he attacks the current model of academic writing more
than actual plagiarism. I think he is making a strong case for including in
college education proper use of secondary sources, which I think would be advantageous.
No comments:
Post a Comment